The Bottom Line

While charts and curves are great for visualizing trends, sometimes you just need the hard numbers.

The Media Efficiency Summary is your financial “Report Card.” It aggregates the entire analysis into a single, clean table that tells you exactly how much you spent, how much you made, and how efficient each channel was.

How to Read the Columns

1. The Basics (Money In, Money Out)

  • Media Spend: The total amount of money you invested in this channel during the analysis period.
  • Media Attributed Revenue: The total incremental sales generated specifically by this channel (excluding baseline organic sales).

2. The Context (Share of Wallet vs. Share of Voice)

  • Media Share: “What percentage of the budget did this channel consume?” (e.g., TV took 20% of my money).
  • Media Contribution: “What percentage of the sales did this channel deliver?” (e.g., TV drove 18% of my sales).

3. The Efficiency Score (ROAS)

  • ROAS (Return on Ad Spend): This is the ultimate efficiency metric. It is calculated as Revenue / Spend.
    • Note: In this table, it is often expressed as a percentage.
    • 100% ROAS = Break-even (You spent $1, you got $1 back).
    • 300% ROAS = You spent $1, you got $3 back.

Strategic Analysis: The “Pilot’s” View

Don’t just read the numbers—compare them. The secret to optimization lies in the gap between specific columns.

1. The Efficiency Gap (Share vs. Contribution) Compare Media Share against Media Contribution.

  • The Winner: If Contribution > Share (e.g., Spend 5%, Drive 7%), the channel is highly efficient. It is punching above its weight.
  • The Loser: If Contribution < Share (e.g., Spend 66%, Drive 67%—wait, that’s actually quite balanced. Let’s look closer). If Spend is 20% but Contribution is only 5%, you are “subsidizing” a failing channel.

2. The ROAS Reality Check Look at the ROAS column to categorize your channels:

  • The Scalers (>200% / >2.0): These are your engines of growth. In the example image, print_spnd has a massive 413% ROAS. This suggests you might be under-investing here—try increasing the budget.
  • The Sustainers (100-150% / 1.0-1.5): These are profitable but tight. They are good for volume, but don’t expect them to transform your bottom line.
  • The Bleeders (<100% / <1.0): You are losing money on every transaction. Unless this is a “Brand Awareness” play intended to pay off years later, you should cut or fix this immediately.

Summary

  • High ROAS? Investigate scaling up.
  • Contribution > Share? The channel is efficient.
  • Contribution < Share? The channel is expensive (or saturated).